Skip Nav

Action Research

Three Purposes for Action Research

❶Task Group reports, discuss future contacts, create new Advisory Group. Achieving Success in a Standards-Based System In most jurisdictions standards-driven accountability systems have become the norm.

What Are Some Resources Where You Can Find Examples of Research Papers?

The Action Research Process
Contributors
How Do You Write a Research Paper on Drug Abuse?

Another important element is the problem statement, which identifies the focus, research questions and challenges the writer faces in developing an effective strategy. The body of the paper addresses the writer's methods of data collection and analysis of their impact.

Data collection usually involves actionable fieldwork, enabling researchers to tailor their analyses to their own environments. Toward the conclusion, the paper reports findings and presents a plan to take action to implement a proven, repeatable method. Quick Answer An action research paper documents a "cycle of inquiry," in which the writer evaluates a problem and develops a strategy of reform.

Full Answer Action research papers provide a valuable inquiry process for settings in which a group of professionals need ongoing reform to deliver the best results. This should not be viewed as indicative of a problem. Schools whose faculties cannot agree on a single research focus can still use action research as a tool to help transform themselves into a learning organization.

They accomplish this in the same manner as do the physicians at the medical center. It is common practice in a quality medical center for physicians to engage in independent, even idiosyncratic, research agendas. However, it is also common for medical researchers to share the findings obtained from their research with colleagues even those engaged in other specialties. If ever there were a time and a strategy that were right for each other, the time is now and the strategy is action research!

This is true for a host of reasons, with none more important than the need to accomplish the following: Enhance the motivation and efficacy of a weary faculty. Meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student body. Teaching in North America has evolved in a manner that makes it more like blue-collar work than a professional undertaking. Although blue-collar workers are expected to do their jobs with vigilance and vigor, it is also assumed that their tasks will be routine, straightforward, and, therefore, easily handled by an isolated worker with only the occasional support of a supervisor.

Professional work, on the other hand, is expected to be complex and nonroutine, and will generally require collaboration among practitioners to produce satisfactory results. With the exploding knowledge base on teaching and learning and the heightened demands on teachers to help all children achieve mastery of meaningful objectives, the inadequacy of the blue-collar model for teaching is becoming much clearer.

When the teachers in a school begin conducting action research, their workplace begins to take on more of the flavor of the workplaces of other professionals. The wisdom that informs practice starts coming from those doing the work, not from supervisors who oftentimes are less in touch with and less sensitive to the issues of teaching and learning than the teachers doing the work. Furthermore, when teachers begin engaging their colleagues in discussions of classroom issues, the multiple perspectives that emerge and thus frame the dialogue tend to produce wiser professional decisions.

The work of teaching has always been difficult. But now it isn't just the demands of the classroom that are wearing teachers down.

Students increasingly bring more problems into the classroom; parental and societal expectations keep increasing; and financial cutbacks make it clear that today's teachers are being asked to do more with less. Worse still, the respect that society had traditionally placed upon public school teachers is eroding, as teacher bashing and attacks on the very value of a public education are becoming a regular part of the political landscape.

Consequently, teacher burnout has become the plague of the modern schoolhouse. However, without credible evidence that the work of teaching is making a difference, it is hard to imagine the best and brightest sticking with such a difficult and poorly compensated line of work.

Fortunately, evidence has shown that teachers who elect to integrate the use of data into their work start exhibiting the compulsive behavior of fitness enthusiasts who regularly weigh themselves, check their heart rate, and graph data on their improving physical development. For both teachers and athletes, the continuous presence of compelling data that their hard work is paying off becomes, in itself, a vitally energizing force.

In a homogeneous society in which all students come to school looking alike, it might be wise to seek the one right answer to questions of pedagogy. It is now imperative that classroom teachers have strong content background in each of the subjects they teach, be familiar with the range of student differences in their classrooms, and be capable of diagnosing and prescribing appropriate instructional modifications based upon a knowledge of each child's uniqueness.

Crafting solutions to these dynamic and ever changing classroom issues can be an exciting undertaking, especially when one acknowledges that newer and better answers are evolving all the time. Nevertheless, great personal satisfaction comes from playing a role in creating successful solutions to continually changing puzzles. Conversely, if teachers are expected to robotically implement outdated approaches, especially when countless new challenges are arriving at their door, the frustration can become unbearable.

In most jurisdictions standards-driven accountability systems have become the norm. Although they differ somewhat from state to state and province to province, fundamentally these standards-based systems have certain things in common. Specifically, most education departments and ministries have declared that they expect the standards to be rigorous and meaningful, and that they expect all students to meet the standards at the mastery level.

The stakes in the standards movement are high. Students face consequences regarding promotion and graduation. Teachers and schools face ridicule and loss of funding if they fail to meet community expectations. Of course, none of that would be problematic if we as a society knew with certainty how to achieve universal student success. However, the reality is that no large system anywhere in the world has ever been successful in getting every student to master a set of meaningful objectives.

If we accept the truth of that statement, then we need to acknowledge the fact that achieving the goal of universal student mastery will not be easy. That said, most people will agree it is a most noble endeavor in which to invest energy and a worthy goal for any faculty to pursue. The reality is that our public schools will not prevail with the challenges inherent in the standards movement unless they encourage experimentation, inquiry, and dialogue by those pioneers the teachers who are working toward meeting those challenges.

So the time is right for action research. The teachers, schools, and school systems that seize this opportunity and begin investing in the power of inquiry will find that they are re-creating the professional practice of education in their locale as a meaningful and rewarding pursuit.

The interviewing combines some of the features of structured and unstructured interviews, and uses a systematic process to refine the information collected. Neighbourhood meetings are small, partly-structured meetings of neighbours, hosted by one of them in her or his home. They provide higher participation rates and more direct involvement, than many other forms of large-group community participation.

The bibliography on meta-evaluation the evaluation of evaluations was compiled by Patricia Rogers. A naive philosophy of action research 22k. A pragmatic and probably naive approach to philosophy. This paper was prepared for the areol action research and evaluation on line course at the request of some participants.

This is a description of "Option one-and-a-half", a dialectical process in which the strengths of two opposing options are combined to create a third and better option. Action research and participation 5k. Vikki Uhlmann sets out some reasons why, for her, participation in action research is obligatory or nearly so.

An identification of some of the ways in which participants can be involved in action research, from low involvement as informants to high involvement as co-researchers. Approaching an action research thesis 21k. The use of action research for theses is considered, taking into account its dual aims of action and research.

Pam Swepson identifies and discusses some of the philosophical assumptions which underlie different forms of research, especially action research. In doing research you face a number of choices.

This document identifies some of the important choices for those planning a thesis or dissertation, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages that each choice engenders. Qualitative evaluation for program improvement 48k. An action-research style of evaluation is used to illustrate some of the principles of qualitative evaluation methods. Drawing on an evaluation of a fourth-year university class by Adelle Bish, this paper briefly describes the 19 different mechanisms which in the reports of class members assisted learning from experience.

The quality of critical reflection after the event can be helped by questions one can ask oneself before the event. This file gives questions for use before and after action.

Action research and publication 25k. Some issues related to the use of action research for publication and theses are examined. Rigour in action research 12k. In those situations it is designed to address, action research can be a rigorous methodology; these tend to be situations where experimental and quasi-experimental methods are not easily applied.

There are ways in which action respearch can be made more attractive to practitioners, for example by adopting methods for improving both the rigour and the economy in conducting and reporting action research studies. Sources of rigour in action research 28k. This is a paper which was presented at the Association of Qualitative Research conference in Melbourne in July It identifies some of the mechanisms in action research which provide rigour even though action research is typically used in changing situations.

Search is a consensus seeking process. This paper gives details of a workbook for a particular variety of short search. The Snyder evaluation process: The Snyder evaluation process 64k. A fairly detailed description is given of the Snyder evaluation process, a process which combines process evaluation for understanding, outcome evaluation for improvement, and short-cycle evaluation for ongoing improvement.

Soft systems methodology 20k. Titled "Appropriate validity and its attainment", this paper by Bob Dick and Pam Swepson uses soft systems methodology to illustrate some of the ways in which action research processes like soft systems methodology can achieve good standards of rigour.

This technique, probably originating with Richard Beckhard, allows a group of people to pool their assumptions about various people and their attitude to change, and identify ways of approaching them. Theory and experience 12k. The nature and use of theory are briefly considered and some of the traps in the use of theory are identified.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Montessori Parent Education: An Action Research Report, Sarah C. Irving PDF Effects of Mentorship on Teacher Classroom Preparedness at the Secondary Level, Kent Janikula.

Privacy FAQs

"Action research is inquiry or research in the context of focused efforts to improve the quality of an organization and its performance. It typically is designed and conducted by practitioners who analyze the data to improve their own practice. Action research can be done by individuals or by teams of colleagues.

About Our Ads

Action research is known by many other names, including participatory research, collaborative inquiry, emancipatory research, action learning, and contextual action research, but all . Expert Help with Writing Action Research Papers. An action research paper is typically based on a change that is brought about in an organization, society or a particular program. This type of a paper requires extensive research as it has a two way approach that explains the reasons for the action to be implemented and as well as the steps undertaken to bring about the change.

Cookie Info

Receive remarkable help with action research writing. Learn how to write an action research from experienced professionals. We deliver the best help regarding report on action research. Action research resources at Southern Cross University, a set of resource files which support an on-line course in action research.